Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 109
About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Advertise Login 

    Article Cited by others


A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants

Ignacio Lena, AlFaleh Khalid

Year : 2013| Volume: 2| Issue : 2 | Page no: 75-77

   This article has been cited by
1 The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with usual care for preterm infants: systematic review and economic evaluation
Nigel Fleeman,James Mahon,Vickie Bates,Rumona Dickson,Yenal Dundar,Kerry Dwan,Laura Ellis,Eleanor Kotas,Marty Richardson,Prakesh Shah,Ben NJ Shaw
Health Technology Assessment. 2016; 20(30): 1
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants
Dominic Wilkinson,Chad Andersen,Colm PF OæDonnell,Antonio G De Paoli,Brett J Manley
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Nursesæ experiences by using heated humidified high flow cannula to premature infants versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure
Helene Engesland,Berit Johannessen
Journal of Neonatal Nursing. 2016; 22(1): 21
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Noninvasive ventilation in neonates
Avneet Kaur,Manoj Modi,Arun Soni,Anup Thakur,Satish Saluja
Current Medicine Research and Practice. 2014; 4(1): 13
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]


Read this article