Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 1332
 
About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Advertise Login 
     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 153-156

Efficacy of different types of phototherapy devices: A 3-year prospective study from Northern India


1 Department of Pediatrics, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Javeed Iqbal Bhat
Department of Pediatrics, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar - 190 011, Jammu and Kashmir
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2249-4847.191245

Rights and Permissions

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of light-emitting diode (LED) over conventional phototherapy in near-term and term Rh-compatible otherwise healthy neonates in resource-constrained settings. Design: This was a 3-year prospective observational study. Setting: The study was conducted in the neonatal unit of a teaching hospital. Patients: Near-term and term (≥35 weeks of gestation) Rh-compatible, otherwise healthy, newborns were included in the study. Interventions: Single surface LED or conventional phototherapy was performed. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome variable was the duration of phototherapy, and the secondary outcome variables were a rate of fall in the total serum bilirubin (TSB) and need for exchange transfusion. Results: A total of 406 patients constituted the study population. Two hundred and thirty patients received LED phototherapy, and 176 patients received conventional phototherapy. The birth weight, gestational age, gender, mean TSB, and other baseline laboratory parameters were similar in both groups. The median duration of phototherapy in the LED group (22.0 h [95% confidence interval: 20.47, 23.53]) was significantly less than that in the conventional phototherapy group (32.0 h [95% confidence interval: 29.8, 34.1]). Similarly, the rate of fall of TSB at 6, 12, and 18 h was significantly higher in LED group than in the conventional group. Fifteen patients (6.5%) received double volume exchange transfusion in LED group and twenty patients (11.4%) in the conventional group. Conclusions: LED phototherapy was found more efficacious than conventional phototherapy in resource-constrained settings, where the majority of jaundiced patients are managed with latter one and because of limited resources irradiance is never checked or checked inappropriately, which can be a source of serious error.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
  Search Pubmed for
  Search in Google Scholar for
Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2417    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded245    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal