Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 987
 
About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Advertise Login 
     


 
 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 70

Authors' reply


Department of Pediatrics, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalapet, Puducherry, India

Date of Web Publication6-Jan-2016

Correspondence Address:
Lalitha Krishnan
Department of Pediatrics, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalapet, Puducherry
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Krishnan L. Authors' reply. J Clin Neonatol 2016;5:70

How to cite this URL:
Krishnan L. Authors' reply. J Clin Neonatol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 15];5:70. Available from: http://www.jcnonweb.com/text.asp?2016/5/1/70/173274

Sir,

We thank the authors for their insightful queries on our paper on delayed cord clamping.[1]

Regarding the first query about timing of cord clamping within 10 seconds in controls, we wanted to make only one change i.e. delayed cord clamping. We timed the existing practice in our institution and it turned out to be around 10 seconds. There was no plan to show an enhanced difference in serum ferritin between the two groups. Regarding increase in respiratory rate there was a statistically significant difference which did not translate to clinical tachypnea. None of the babies needed oxygen or NICU admission for treatment of respiratory distress. We agree anemia estimation could have been done at a later date, there are differing timings depending on the design of the study. Two previous studies cited in the article from India documented haemoglobin level three months after birth. A recent article also compared haemoglobin at six weeks of age.[2]

The regression model has been explained in detail in the methodology. However, if the authors so desire, they are welcome to correspond directly for details.

There is a good review article addressing various issues associated with delayed cord clamping by Raju et al.[3]

 
  References Top

1.
Krishnan L, Kommu PP, Thomas BJ, Akila B, Daniel M. Should delayed cord clamping be the standard of care in term low risk deliveries? A randomized controlled trial from a medical college hospital in South India. J Clin Neonatol 2015;4:183-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
  Medknow Journal  
2.
Kumar B, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Jaiwal V, Joshi P, Dubey K. Umbilical cord milking and hematological parameters in moderate to late preterm neonates: A randomized control trial. Indian Pediatr 2015;52:753-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Raju TN. Timing of umbilical cord clamping after birth for optimizing placental transfusion. Curr Opin Pediatr 2013;25:180.  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
  Search Pubmed for
  Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed917    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded104    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal