Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 956
 
About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Advertise Login 
     


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 3-7

Delayed neuroprotection in the era of hypothermia: What can we add?


1 Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
2 Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Date of Web Publication6-Jan-2016

Correspondence Address:
Alistair J Gunn
Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019
New Zealand
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2249-4847.173279

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Despite the successful clinical translation of therapeutic hypothermia for perinatal encephalopathy into routine care, treatment is only partially effective. It is likely that this reflects the formidable challenges of initiating treatment for neonatal encephalopathy within a few hours after birth. In randomized controlled trials, cooling has been typically initiated at a mean of 4 to 5 h after birth. This is clearly not optimal, given accumulating evidence that cooling is significantly more effective when it can be initiated before 3 h. In this review, we propose that given the consistent evidence that milder hypoxic-ischemic injury is associated with slower evolution of damage, any future clinical trials of delayed treatment starting more than 6 h after an insult should target infants with milder encephalopathy. We then critically examine the evidence that erythropoietin is one of the most promising preclinical candidates either for co-treatment with the mild therapeutic hypothermia or to support neuroregeneration after the therapeutic window for acute neuroprotection.

Keywords: Erythropoietin, hypothermia, neuroprotection, perinatal asphyxia


How to cite this article:
Gunn AJ, Groenendaal F. Delayed neuroprotection in the era of hypothermia: What can we add?. J Clin Neonatol 2016;5:3-7

How to cite this URL:
Gunn AJ, Groenendaal F. Delayed neuroprotection in the era of hypothermia: What can we add?. J Clin Neonatol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 15];5:3-7. Available from: http://www.jcnonweb.com/text.asp?2016/5/1/3/173279


  Introduction Top


Mild therapeutic hypothermia for full term or near-term infants who develop moderate to severe encephalopathy after perinatal hypoxia-ischemia (HI) is now the standard of care in modern neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The introduction of therapeutic hypothermia has reduced adverse outcomes of death or severe disability in this population to approximately 45–50%.[1],[2] Obviously, a key question is whether there are specific patients or mechanisms that could be targeted to further improve outcomes.

It is highly like that in part, partial neuroprotection in the clinical practice is related to the formidable clinical difficulties involved in starting hypothermia within the optimal window of opportunity.[3] A recent study found that asphyxiated infants cooled within 3 h of birth had better motor outcomes than when hypothermia was started between 3 and 6 h.[4] However, in a controlled trial, hypothermia was only started in 12% of infants within 4 h of birth, and the average time of starting was around 5 h of age.[5] In view of the evidence that earlier cooling is more effective, passive cooling is now often started much sooner after resuscitation, although the effects on outcome are still unclear.[6] Thus, it would be highly desirable to find ways to improve outcome from delayed treatment started either late in the first 6 h, the known window of opportunity for current protocols, or even more than 6 h after an insult.

During the last decade, a range of potential neuroprotective strategies that might be effective when used beyond the first 6 h of life have been tested in animal experiments as well as in small clinical studies. These interventions included inhibition of inflammation, including inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase, and stimulation of endogenous repair mechanisms.[7] In the present review, we will discuss first which patients are most likely to respond to delayed treatment, and then consider the evidence for whether inflammation or erythropoietin (EPO) are potential therapeutic targets.


  Milder Injury Evolves More Slowly Top


Systematic reviews have shown that the beneficial effects of therapeutic hypothermia were greater in infants with moderate than severe encephalopathy;[8] infants with mild encephalopathy in the first 6 h of life were excluded from most of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The definition of moderate encephalopathy is difficult. In many trials, a “modified” Sarnat score was used.[5],[9] However, this score was developed from a relatively small number of patients at a time when modern neuroimaging was not yet available, and used a mixture of clinical and electroencephalography criteria,[10] whereas the recent clinical trials only used the clinical criteria. Infants with mild to moderate encephalopathy not surprisingly have less clear-cut symptoms than those with moderate to severe encephalopathy, and so they may be referred too late to NICUs to qualify for treatment with hypothermia.[11] In general, hypothermia should start within 6 h after the hypoxic-ischemic insult because of compelling preclinical evidence that it is unlikely to be beneficial after 6 h,[3] and clinical evidence of improved effect with earlier cooling.[4] Although there is potential for adverse effects when cooling is started late,[12] delayed cooling appears to be safe in an intensive care environment.[13]

It is important to appreciate that in clinical practice, the severity of neonatal encephalopathy is defined in retrospect, typically after 48 to 72 h.[10] However, for clinical treatment, we need to define severity prospectively. It is less accurate to estimate severity in the first few hours after birth because the clinical severity of encephalopathy evolves over time and the greatest severity attained over time correlates the most with long-term outcomes.[14] Thus, in some cases, severity can progress from “mild” to moderate, as described in detail by Sarnat and Sarnat.[10] Given this background, it is not surprising that mild encephalopathy observed in the first few hours after birth can also be associated with adverse long-term effects.[15],[16],[17] However, this relatively neglected group may actually have the greatest chance of benefit from treatment delayed by more than 6 h after an insult.

In neonatal rodents, there is evidence that histological injury evolves more slowly after mild than severe HI.[18] Further, mild hypothermia was protective up to 3 h after a moderate (90 min) period of HI in P7 rats, whereas hypothermia was not protective after a severe (150 min) insult.[12] Indeed, 12 h delay after the severe insult before starting hypothermia seemed to increase brain injury.[12] Other manipulations that increase the severity of the injury, such as pretreatment with lipopolysaccharide, may also be associated with reduced effectiveness of mild hypothermia.[19] Conversely, interventions that delay the evolution of injury, including a brief early interval of hypothermia or some anticonvulsants, such as phenobarbital or topiramate, can expand the window of opportunity for other treatments.[20],[21],[22] These data suggest the hypothesis that the window of opportunity for delayed treatment would be longer after milder insults.


  Blockade of Inflammation Top


HI brain injury is consistently associated with a persistent secondary inflammatory reaction.[23],[24],[25] Inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 beta are induced in rodents within 3 h of HI and peak after approximately 24 h.[26] Consistent with this, in rats, expression of microglia-macrophage markers is seen within 10 to 24 h of HI and peaks after approximately 2–4 days.[18],[27] In the acute phase after neonatal stroke in rats, the inflammatory cells in the brain mainly include resident microglia, rather than invading monocytes.[28]

The nature of microglial activity evolves dramatically over time after injury.[29] Thus, whereas activated microglia initially express a so-called M1 phenotype, and can contribute to brain injury through the production of pro-inflammatory mediators, proteases, nitric oxide, and reactive oxygen species,[30] they transit toward a protective or M2 phenotype, with restorative and neuroprotective activity over time.[31] Consistent with this phenotypic transition, the net effect of depletion of microglia was to worsen injury after HI in both adult [32] and neonatal rodents.[33]

Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), an important modulator of inflammation that also controls transcription of genes promoting apoptosis and other cellular injury response genes, is induced maximally in two phases, at 3–6 and 24 h after HI.[34] Selective NF-κB inhibition has neuroprotective effects that are predominantly mediated via anti-apoptotic mechanisms, including prevention of accumulation of p53, independent of cytokine production.[24] The timing of NF-κB inhibition was critical for neuroprotection, which was only observed when early activation was blocked, whereas prevention of both early and late NF-κB-activity aggravated damage.[34]

Thus, taken together, these data show that blocking inflammation is extremely unlikely to be an effective strategy for delayed neuroprotection, and indeed may have potential to increase damage by impairing the activity of beneficial microglial phenotypes.


  Can We Improve Neuroregeneration? a Possible Role for Erythropoietin Top


EPO, a hematopoietic cytokine, is an autocrine and paracrine hormone of the nervous system. Neuronal mRNA expression of EPO and the EPO-receptor are markedly increased in response to hypoxia,[35],[36] likely mediated through the activation of hypoxia-induced-factor-1α. EPO has both neuroprotective as well as neuroregenerative effects.[7] Neuroprotection by EPO includes anti-inflammatory, anti-excitotoxic, antioxidant, and anti-apoptotic effects, as well as upregulation of neurogenesis, oligodendrogenesis, and angiogenesis.[37]


  Evidence from Animal Experiments Top


EPO treatment after both HI and focal stroke in neonatal rodents has been associated with improved recovery of sensorimotor function,[38],[39] behavioral and cognitive performance,[40] and preservation of the integrity of cerebral tissue.[41] Further, EPO was induced in astroglia after pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus in adult rats, and in the same model, treatment with exogenous human EPO improved neuronal survival in the hippocampus.[42] This is potentially important given that drug-resistant status epilepticus is highly associated with adverse outcomes after asphyxia.[43] Further, infusion of EPO to fetal sheep exposed to lipopolysaccharide protected against inflammatory brain injury and improved myelination of the corticospinal tract and the optic nerve.[44]

In rodent stroke models, multiple doses were more effective than a single dose. Three doses of 1000 U/kg given immediately postinjury, 24 h, and 7 days later showed similar benefit to 3 doses of 5000 U/kg, given at 24 h intervals for 3 days after injury.[45],[46] These data emphasize the importance of choosing an appropriate dosing regimen to achieve neuroprotection. Moreover, recent studies indicate that the neuroprotective effects might be dependent on species, severity of the insult, and even the sex of the animal.[47],[48]

There is relatively limited evidence on the effect of combined treatment with hypothermia and EPO. After HI in P7 neonatal rats, one report found no significant neuroprotection with either hypothermia or combination therapy started immediately after the insult.[49] Another group found that in the same paradigm, there was a borderline additive effect of EPO to improve sensory-motor function when combined with postinsult mild hypothermia but that there was no additional effect of EPO on brain histology.[50] More encouragingly, in nonhuman primates, treatment with hypothermia and EPO after umbilical cord occlusion at term improved motor and cognitive responses, cerebellar growth, and reduced death or disability, with a number needed to treat of 2.[51] These studies focused on immediate treatment. We speculate that given the significant effects of EPO to promote neuroregeneration, further animal studies are justified to examine whether combined treatment can also improve functional outcomes after delayed treatment.


  Safety of Erythropoietin in Preterm Infants Top


EPO is already in wide use to support erythropoiesis in preterm infants, typically in regimes of 400 U/kg 3 times a week subcutaneously, or 200 U/kg daily intravenously.[7] In controlled trials in preterm infants, three intravenous infusions of up to 2500 U/kg per infusion 24 h apart,[52] or 3000 U/kg at 3 to 6, 12 to 18, and 36 to 42 h after birth,[53] respectively, were not associated with any increase in morbidity or mortality.


  Clinical Trials of Erythropoietin in Full Term Infants With Perinatal Asphyxia Top


In a phase one, dose escalation study in full term infants with perinatal HI, up to 2500 U/kg of EPO per dose starting within 24 h after birth, given up to 6 times, 48 h apart, appeared to be safe.[54] Two RCTs of EPO for human infants with HI encephalopathy have been published,[55],[56] and one with open label EPO.[57] Only one study had sufficient power to show beneficial effects of EPO in infants with moderate encephalopathy.[55] Disappointingly, no long-term beneficial effects of EPO were found in infants treated with EPO after cardiac surgery.[58] This was a relatively small pilot study that was not powered to assess neurodevelopmental outcomes; 59 infants were studied, of whom 22 children were treated with EPO, 20 controls survived and had neurodevelopmental testing. Further, only two postoperative doses were administered 24 h apart; it is possible that more prolonged treatment is needed for long-term benefit.[45],[46] In a study in term infants who had ischemic infarcts confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging, EPO administration appeared to be safe.[59] Additional studies of EPO in combination with hypothermia are ongoing, with promising preliminary results.[54]

This extensive clinical experience with EPO, and evidence that high dose EPO is safe even in sick infants, raises the interesting possibility that an alternative strategy might be to start treatment with EPO in infants with suspected encephalopathy as soon as possible after birth, while they are being evaluated. The decision whether or not to start active hypothermia, and to continue EPO treatment, could then be made once the diagnosis was established, thus minimizing treatment delay. To the best of our knowledge, no preclinical or clinical studies have evaluated the feasibilty or net effect on outcomes of such an approach; this would be an important area for future research.


  Conclusions Top


Initiating treatment for neonatal encephalopathy shortly after birth remains a formidable challenge. Although further studies are needed, based on the current evidence, EPO is one of the most promising preclinical candidates either for co-treatment with mild therapeutic hypothermia or to support neuroregeneration after the therapeutic window for acute neuroprotection. We speculate that clinical trials of delayed therapy should consider targeting infants with milder encephalopathy.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Jacobs SE, Berg M, Hunt R, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Inder TE, Davis PG. Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;1:CD003311.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Groenendaal F, Casaer A, Dijkman KP, Gavilanes AW, de Haan TR, ter Horst HJ, et al. Introduction of hypothermia for neonates with perinatal asphyxia in the Netherlands and Flanders. Neonatology 2013;104:15-21.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Gunn AJ, Thoresen M. Hypothermic neuroprotection. NeuroRx 2006;3:154-69.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Thoresen M, Tooley J, Liu X, Jary S, Fleming P, Luyt K, et al. Time is brain: Starting therapeutic hypothermia within three hours after birth improves motor outcome in asphyxiated newborns. Neonatology 2013;104:228-33.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Gluckman PD, Wyatt JS, Azzopardi D, Ballard R, Edwards AD, Ferriero DM, et al. Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy: Multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2005;365:663-70.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Chaudhary R, Farrer K, Broster S, McRitchie L, Austin T. Active versus passive cooling during neonatal transport. Pediatrics 2013;132:841-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Robertson NJ, Tan S, Groenendaal F, van Bel F, Juul SE, Bennet L, et al. Which neuroprotective agents are ready for bench to bedside translation in the newborn infant? J Pediatr 2012;160:544-52.e4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Edwards AD, Brocklehurst P, Gunn AJ, Halliday H, Juszczak E, Levene M, et al. Neurological outcomes at 18 months of age after moderate hypothermia for perinatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: Synthesis and meta-analysis of trial data. BMJ 2010;340:c363.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Ehrenkranz RA, Tyson JE, McDonald SA, Donovan EF, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1574-84.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. A clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol 1976;33:696-705.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
DuPont TL, Chalak LF, Morriss MC, Burchfield PJ, Christie L, Sánchez PJ. Short-term outcomes of newborns with perinatal acidemia who are not eligible for systemic hypothermia therapy. J Pediatr 2013;162:35-41.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sabir H, Scull-Brown E, Liu X, Thoresen M. Immediate hypothermia is not neuroprotective after severe hypoxia-ischemia and is deleterious when delayed by 12 hours in neonatal rats. Stroke 2012;43:3364-70.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Smit E, Liu X, Jary S, Cowan F, Thoresen M. Cooling neonates who do not fulfil the standard cooling criteria – Short- and long-term outcomes. Acta Paediatr 2015;104:138-45.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Thompson CM, Puterman AS, Linley LL, Hann FM, van der Elst CW, Molteno CD, et al. The value of a scoring system for hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in predicting neurodevelopmental outcome. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:757-61.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Nagy Z, Lindström K, Westerberg H, Skare S, Andersson J, Hallberg B, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging on teenagers, born at term with moderate hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatr Res 2005;58:936-40.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Marlow N, Rose AS, Rands CE, Draper ES. Neuropsychological and educational problems at school age associated with neonatal encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:F380-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
van Kooij BJ, van Handel M, Nievelstein RA, Groenendaal F, Jongmans MJ, de Vries LS. Serial MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome in 9- to 10-year-old children with neonatal encephalopathy. J Pediatr 2010;157:221-7.e2.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Beilharz EJ, Williams CE, Dragunow M, Sirimanne ES, Gluckman PD. Mechanisms of delayed cell death following hypoxic-ischemic injury in the immature rat: Evidence for apoptosis during selective neuronal loss. Mol Brain Res 1995;29:1-14.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Osredkar D, Thoresen M, Maes E, Flatebø T, Elstad M, Sabir H. Hypothermia is not neuroprotective after infection-sensitized neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Resuscitation 2014;85:567-72.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Guan J, Gunn AJ, Sirimanne ES, Tuffin J, Gunning MI, Clark R, et al. The window of opportunity for neuronal rescue with insulin-like growth factor-1 after hypoxia-ischemia in rats is critically modulated by cerebral temperature during recovery. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000;20:513-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Barks JD, Liu YQ, Shangguan Y, Silverstein FS. Phenobarbital augments hypothermic neuroprotection. Pediatr Res 2010;67:532-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Liu Y, Barks JD, Xu G, Silverstein FS. Topiramate extends the therapeutic window for hypothermia-mediated neuroprotection after stroke in neonatal rats. Stroke 2004;35:1460-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Klempt ND, Sirimanne E, Gunn AJ, Klempt M, Singh K, Williams C, et al. Hypoxia-ischemia induces transforming growth factor beta 1 mRNA in the infant rat brain. Mol Brain Res 1992;13:93-101.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Nijboer CH, Heijnen CJ, Groenendaal F, May MJ, van Bel F, Kavelaars A. Strong neuroprotection by inhibition of NF-kappaB after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia involves apoptotic mechanisms but is independent of cytokines. Stroke 2008;39:2129-37.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Davidson JO, Green CR, Nicholson LF, O'Carroll SJ, Fraser M, Bennet L, et al. Connexin hemichannel blockade improves outcomes in a model of fetal ischemia. Ann Neurol 2012;71:121-32.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Bonestroo HJ, Nijboer CH, van Velthoven CT, Kavelaars A, Hack CE, van Bel F, et al. Cerebral and hepatic inflammatory response after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia in newborn rats. Dev Neurosci 2013;35:197-211.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Groenendaal F, Lammers H, Smit D, Nikkels PG. Nitrotyrosine in brain tissue of neonates after perinatal asphyxia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006;91:F429-33.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Denker SP, Ji S, Dingman A, Lee SY, Derugin N, Wendland MF, et al. Macrophages are comprised of resident brain microglia not infiltrating peripheral monocytes acutely after neonatal stroke. J Neurochem 2007;100:893-904.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol 2008;8:958-69.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Svedin P, Hagberg H, Sävman K, Zhu C, Mallard C. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene knock-out protects the immature brain after cerebral hypoxia-ischemia. J Neurosci 2007;27:1511-8.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Imai F, Suzuki H, Oda J, Ninomiya T, Ono K, Sano H, et al. Neuroprotective effect of exogenous microglia in global brain ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007;27:488-500.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Lalancette-Hébert M, Gowing G, Simard A, Weng YC, Kriz J. Selective ablation of proliferating microglial cells exacerbates ischemic injury in the brain. J Neurosci 2007;27:2596-605.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Faustino JV, Wang X, Johnson CE, Klibanov A, Derugin N, Wendland MF, et al. Microglial cells contribute to endogenous brain defenses after acute neonatal focal stroke. J Neurosci 2011;31:12992-3001.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Nijboer CH, Heijnen CJ, Groenendaal F, May MJ, van Bel F, Kavelaars A. A dual role of the NF-kappaB pathway in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Stroke 2008;39:2578-86.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Juul SE, Anderson DK, Li Y, Christensen RD. Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptor in the developing human central nervous system. Pediatr Res 1998;43:40-9.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Castillo-Meléndez M, Yan E, Walker DW. Expression of erythropoietin and its receptor in the brain of late-gestation fetal sheep, and responses to asphyxia caused by umbilical cord occlusion. Dev Neurosci 2005;27:220-7.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Rangarajan V, Juul SE. Erythropoietin: Emerging role of erythropoietin in neonatal neuroprotection. Pediatr Neurol 2014;51:481-8.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Chang YS, Mu D, Wendland M, Sheldon RA, Vexler ZS, McQuillen PS, et al. Erythropoietin improves functional and histological outcome in neonatal stroke. Pediatr Res 2005;58:106-11.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Spandou E, Papadopoulou Z, Soubasi V, Karkavelas G, Simeonidou C, Pazaiti A, et al. Erythropoietin prevents long-term sensorimotor deficits and brain injury following neonatal hypoxia-ischemia in rats. Brain Res 2005;1045:22-30.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Demers EJ, McPherson RJ, Juul SE. Erythropoietin protects dopaminergic neurons and improves neurobehavioral outcomes in juvenile rats after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia. Pediatr Res 2005;58:297-301.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Matsushita H, Johnston MV, Lange MS, Wilson MA. Protective effect of erythropoietin in neonatal hypoxic ischemia in mice. Neuroreport 2003;14:1757-61.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Nadam J, Navarro F, Sanchez P, Moulin C, Georges B, Laglaine A, et al. Neuroprotective effects of erythropoietin in the rat hippocampus after pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus. Neurobiol Dis 2007;25:412-26.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Drury PP, Davidson JO, van den Heuij LG, Wassink G, Gunn ER, Booth LC, et al. Status epilepticus after prolonged umbilical cord occlusion is associated with greater neural injury in fetal sheep at term-equivalent. PLoS One 2014;9:e96530.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Rees S, Hale N, De Matteo R, Cardamone L, Tolcos M, Loeliger M, et al. Erythropoietin is neuroprotective in a preterm ovine model of endotoxin-induced brain injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2010;69:306-19.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Gonzalez FF, Abel R, Almli CR, Mu D, Wendland M, Ferriero DM. Erythropoietin sustains cognitive function and brain volume after neonatal stroke. Dev Neurosci 2009;31:403-11.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Kellert BA, McPherson RJ, Juul SE. A comparison of high-dose recombinant erythropoietin treatment regimens in brain-injured neonatal rats. Pediatr Res 2007;61:451-5.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Wen TC, Rogido M, Peng H, Genetta T, Moore J, Sola A. Gender differences in long-term beneficial effects of erythropoietin given after neonatal stroke in postnatal day-7 rats. Neuroscience 2006;139:803-11.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Juul SE. Hypothermia plus erythropoietin for neonatal neuroprotection? Commentary on Fan et al. and Fang et al. Pediatr Res 2013;73:10-1.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Fang AY, Gonzalez FF, Sheldon RA, Ferriero DM. Effects of combination therapy using hypothermia and erythropoietin in a rat model of neonatal hypoxia-ischemia. Pediatr Res 2013;73:12-7.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Fan X, van Bel F, van der Kooij MA, Heijnen CJ, Groenendaal F. Hypothermia and erythropoietin for neuroprotection after neonatal brain damage. Pediatr Res 2013;73:18-23.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Traudt CM, McPherson RJ, Bauer LA, Richards TL, Burbacher TM, McAdams RM, et al. Concurrent erythropoietin and hypothermia treatment improve outcomes in a term nonhuman primate model of perinatal asphyxia. Dev Neurosci 2013;35:491-503.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Juul SE, McPherson RJ, Bauer LA, Ledbetter KJ, Gleason CA, Mayock DE. A phase I/II trial of high-dose erythropoietin in extremely low birth weight infants: Pharmacokinetics and safety. Pediatrics 2008;122:383-91.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Fauchère JC, Dame C, Vonthein R, Koller B, Arri S, Wolf M, et al. An approach to using recombinant erythropoietin for neuroprotection in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2008;122:375-82.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Rogers EE, Bonifacio SL, Glass HC, Juul SE, Chang T, Mayock DE, et al. Erythropoietin and hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatr Neurol 2014;51:657-62.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Zhu C, Kang W, Xu F, Cheng X, Zhang Z, Jia L, et al. Erythropoietin improved neurologic outcomes in newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics 2009;124:e218-26.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Avasiloaiei A, Dimitriu C, Moscalu M, Paduraru L, Stamatin M. High-dose phenobarbital or erythropoietin for the treatment of perinatal asphyxia in term newborns. Pediatr Int 2013;55:589-93.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Elmahdy H, El-Mashad AR, El-Bahrawy H, El-Gohary T, El-Barbary A, Aly H. Human recombinant erythropoietin in asphyxia neonatorum: Pilot trial. Pediatrics 2010;125:e1135-42.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Andropoulos DB, Brady K, Easley RB, Dickerson HA, Voigt RG, Shekerdemian LS, et al. Erythropoietin neuroprotection in neonatal cardiac surgery: A phase I/II safety and efficacy trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:124-31.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Benders MJ, van der Aa NE, Roks M, van Straaten HL, Isgum I, Viergever MA, et al. Feasibility and safety of erythropoietin for neuroprotection after perinatal arterial ischemic stroke. J Pediatr 2014;164:481-6.e1-2.  Back to cited text no. 59
    



This article has been cited by
1 Electroencephalography studies of hypoxic ischemia in fetal and neonatal animal models
Hamid Abbasi,CharlesP Unsworth
Neural Regeneration Research. 2020; 15(5): 828
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Applications of advanced signal processing and machine learning in the neonatal hypoxic-ischemic electroencephalogram
Hamid Abbasi,CharlesP Unsworth
Neural Regeneration Research. 2020; 15(2): 222
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Chronic inflammation and impaired development of the preterm brain
Laura Bennet,Simerdeep Dhillon,Chris A. Lear,Lotte van den Heuij,Victoria King,Justin M. Dean,Guido Wassink,Joanne O. Davidson,Alistair Jan Gunn
Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2018; 125: 45
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Xenon Combined With Hypothermia in Perinatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Noble Gas, a Noble Mission
Ashraf R. Amer,Dorothy E. Oorschot
Pediatric Neurology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 The fetus at the tipping point: modifying the outcome of fetal asphyxia
Simerdeep K. Dhillon,Christopher A. Lear,Robert Galinsky,Guido Wassink,Joanne O. Davidson,Sandra Juul,Nicola J. Robertson,Alistair J. Gunn,Laura Bennet
The Journal of Physiology. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
  Search Pubmed for
  Search in Google Scholar for
Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Milder Injury Ev...
Blockade of Infl...
Can We Improve N...
Evidence from An...
Safety of Erythr...
Clinical Trials ...
Conclusions
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1998    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded404    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal